Table of Contents
Why People Search for n8n Alternatives
The keyword "n8n alternatives" gets over 1,000 searches per month — and the search intent breaks down into a few clear frustrations:
- n8n Cloud is expensive — n8n's cloud plans start at $20/month and scale quickly with workflow executions
- Self-hosting feels complex — Docker, SSL, domain setup, reverse proxy, and keeping updates running is a real barrier for non-developers
- Looking for something simpler — not every use case needs n8n's full power; some users want a lighter tool
- Free alternatives — "n8n free alternatives" and "free alternatives to n8n" together drive 250+ searches per month
- Open source requirements — data sovereignty, GDPR, and vendor lock-in concerns push teams toward "open source alternatives to n8n workflow automation"
Here's the thing most comparison guides skip: managed n8n hosting solves all of these problems at once. At $2.99/month with a 7-day free trial, OpenHosst's managed n8n is cheaper than every paid alternative below, removes the self-hosting complexity entirely, and keeps n8n's open source nature intact.
That said — we'll give every alternative a fair review. You might genuinely prefer one of them for your use case.
Quick Comparison: n8n Alternatives at a Glance
| Tool | Open Source | Self-Host | Free Tier | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| n8n (OpenHosst) | ✓ | ✓ Managed | 7-day trial | $2.99/mo |
| Zapier | ✗ | ✗ | 100 tasks/mo | $19.99/mo |
| Make.com | ✗ | ✗ | 1,000 ops/mo | $9/mo |
| Activepieces | ✓ | ✓ | Free self-host | $0 (DIY) |
| IFTTT | ✗ | ✗ | 2 applets | $2.99/mo |
| Pipedream | ✓ (core) | Partial | 10k events/mo | $19/mo |
| Node-RED | ✓ | ✓ | Free | $0 (DIY) |
| Google Cloud Workflows | ✗ | ✗ | 5k steps/mo | Pay per use |
| Automatisch | ✓ | ✓ | Free self-host | $0 (DIY) |
| Gumloop | ✗ | ✗ | Free tier | $97/mo |
| Pabbly Connect | ✗ | ✗ | Limited tasks | $14/mo |
| Microsoft Power Automate | ✗ | ✗ | With M365 | $15/user/mo |
1. Zapier — The Industry Standard (But Pricey)
Zapier is the most widely used workflow automation platform in the world, with over 6,000 app integrations and a no-code interface that anyone can learn in minutes. It pioneered the "Zap" concept — trigger + action — and remains the benchmark that every other tool is compared against.
When people search for an "n8n alternative," they often land on Zapier. But Zapier is actually more frequently the starting point that drives people to n8n — once they hit Zapier's task limits and pricing wall.
Pros
- Largest app library (6,000+ integrations)
- Extremely easy to set up
- Excellent documentation and templates
- Multi-step Zaps with conditional logic
- No technical knowledge needed
Cons
- Task limits on every plan — 750 to 100,000/month
- Expensive at scale ($19.99–$599+/month)
- Closed source — no data sovereignty
- No self-hosting option
- Free tier limited to 100 tasks and 5 Zaps
Pricing: Free (100 tasks/month, 5 Zaps) → Starter $19.99/month (750 tasks) → Professional $49/month (2,000 tasks) → Team $69/month → Company $99+/month. Task limits apply to all plans — exceed them and workflows pause until the next billing cycle.
Verdict
Zapier is the easiest n8n alternative for non-technical users, but you'll pay significantly more for less. At $19.99/month with 750-task limits, it costs 6× more than managed n8n at $2.99/month — which runs unlimited executions. See our full n8n vs Zapier comparison.
2. Make.com — More Power, Better Value Than Zapier
Make.com (formerly Integromat) is the closest cloud-based n8n alternative in terms of visual power. Its scenario builder uses a distinctive circular canvas where you route data through modules with complex branching, filtering, and error handling — more flexible than Zapier's linear Zap chains.
Make.com is frequently cited as one of the best free alternatives to n8n for users who want a visual no-code experience without self-hosting complexity. Its free tier (1,000 operations/month) is substantially more generous than Zapier's.
Pros
- Powerful visual scenario builder
- Better pricing than Zapier ($9/month)
- 1,500+ app integrations
- Generous free tier (1,000 ops/month)
- Advanced data transformations and routers
Cons
- Operation-based pricing confuses new users
- No self-hosting option
- Closed source — vendor lock-in
- Operations count quickly in multi-step flows
- Steeper learning curve than Zapier
Pricing: Free (1,000 ops/month, 2 active scenarios) → Core $9/month (10,000 ops) → Pro $16/month (10,000 ops + advanced features) → Teams $29/month. Important: each action in a multi-step scenario counts as a separate operation.
Verdict
Make.com is the best cloud-only n8n alternative for users who need visual power without code. Still, no self-hosting means your data stays on Make's servers. At scale, operation limits bite harder than you'd expect. Check our detailed Make vs n8n breakdown.
3. Activepieces — The Best Open Source n8n Alternative
Activepieces is the open source n8n alternative that's grown fastest in 2025–2026. Built by a small team and backed by a growing GitHub community, it offers a clean Zapier-like interface, 200+ integrations, and full Docker self-hosting — all under an open source license.
If you're specifically searching for "open source alternatives to n8n" or "n8n open source alternative," Activepieces is the most direct competitor. It's designed to be simpler than n8n while still covering the most common automation use cases.
Pros
- Truly open source (MIT license)
- Free to self-host via Docker
- Clean, intuitive interface
- Active GitHub community
- Purpose-built as an n8n alternative
Cons
- Fewer integrations than n8n (200 vs 400+)
- Less mature AI/agent node support
- Smaller community and fewer templates
- Still requires server setup to self-host
- Cloud version pricing unclear
Pricing: Free to self-host. Cloud pricing available on request. Like all self-hosted tools, you pay for the server — typically $5–10/month on a VPS.
Verdict
Activepieces is the best purely open source n8n alternative for simple-to-medium automations. For complex multi-step workflows with AI agents, custom code nodes, and 400+ integrations, n8n still has a clear lead. For the easiest path to managed open-source automation, OpenHosst's managed n8n at $2.99/month removes the self-hosting burden entirely.
4. IFTTT — Simple Automation for Consumers
IFTTT (If This Then That) was the original app automation platform — and it still serves a distinct audience. Its "Applet" model (one trigger → one action) is about as simple as automation gets, making it ideal for personal productivity, smart home devices, and simple social media triggers.
Searches for "n8n IFTTT alternative" reflect users trying to decide between the two. The answer is: they serve different audiences. IFTTT is for consumers who want plug-and-play simplicity. n8n is for teams and developers who need multi-step workflows with branching logic, data transformations, and API access.
Pros
- Extremely simple — no learning curve
- 700+ consumer services and IoT devices
- Mobile apps (iOS + Android)
- Free for 2 applets
- Great for smart home automation
Cons
- Only IF/THEN logic — no branching
- No multi-step workflows
- No data transformation or filtering
- Not suitable for business automation
- Pro+ ($12.99/mo) still very limited vs n8n
Pricing: Free (2 applets) → Pro $2.99/month (20 applets) → Pro+ $12.99/month (unlimited applets + faster execution).
Verdict
IFTTT is not a true n8n alternative for business workflows — it's a different tool category entirely. If you need simple personal automation (smart lights, social posts, calendar alerts), IFTTT is great. For anything involving APIs, multi-step logic, or data manipulation, IFTTT will hit its ceiling almost immediately.
Already know n8n is the right choice?
Skip the alternatives. Start your 7-day free trial of managed n8n hosting — set up in minutes, no server knowledge required, from $2.99/month.
Start Free Trial →5. Pipedream — Best for Developers
Pipedream is a developer-first workflow automation platform that lets you write real code — Node.js, Python, Go, or Bash — inside each workflow step. It bridges the gap between no-code tools and full custom development, making it a strong n8n alternative for engineering teams who want code flexibility alongside visual orchestration.
Pipedream's core is open source and it integrates with 1,000+ APIs. The hosted version has a generous free tier of 10,000 events per month, which covers most individual or small-team workloads.
Pros
- Write real code (Node.js, Python, Go)
- 1,000+ pre-built API integrations
- Generous free tier (10k events/month)
- Open source core on GitHub
- Excellent for webhook-driven workflows
Cons
- Requires coding knowledge for advanced use
- Hosted platform is cloud-only (no self-host)
- Paid plans start at $19/month (100k events)
- Less visual than n8n for non-developers
- Execution time limits on free tier
Pricing: Free (10,000 events/month, limited compute) → Basic $19/month (100,000 events) → Advanced $49/month (500,000 events). Self-hosting the open source version is possible but not officially supported for production use.
Verdict
Pipedream is an excellent n8n alternative for developer teams who prefer writing code over dragging nodes. For non-developers, n8n's visual builder is far more accessible. For teams that want both code and visual — n8n supports custom JavaScript/Python code nodes too, plus managed hosting from $2.99/month.
6. Node-RED — Open Source Powerhouse (for Technical Users)
Node-RED is a flow-based visual programming tool originally created by IBM, now maintained by the OpenJS Foundation. It uses a drag-and-drop node editor similar in concept to n8n, but is built primarily around Node.js streams and is especially popular for IoT, Raspberry Pi projects, and enterprise data pipelines.
As a free open source alternative to n8n, Node-RED is genuinely powerful. The difference is its focus: Node-RED excels at low-level data flows and device integration; n8n excels at SaaS and API automation.
Pros
- Completely free and open source
- Huge node library (3,000+ community nodes)
- Excellent for IoT and Raspberry Pi
- Strong Node.js ecosystem integration
- Active community since 2013
Cons
- Requires server setup and maintenance
- Not designed for SaaS API automation
- Dated UI compared to modern alternatives
- No managed hosting option
- Steep learning curve for business workflows
Pricing: Free to self-host. You pay only for the server (typically $5–10/month). No managed cloud offering — you're entirely responsible for setup, SSL, updates, and uptime.
Verdict
Node-RED is the right choice if you're building IoT pipelines, working with MQTT, or integrating hardware devices. For business automation (CRM, email, webhooks, SaaS APIs), n8n's node library and visual builder are far better suited — and managed hosting means you don't have to run the server yourself.
7. Google Cloud Workflows — Google's n8n Alternative
"Google n8n alternative" and "n8n alternative from Google" collectively get 200+ searches per month — and the answer is Google Cloud Workflows, Google's serverless workflow orchestration service inside Google Cloud Platform (GCP).
Google Cloud Workflows lets you define multi-step processes using YAML or JSON syntax, call HTTP endpoints, interact with GCP services (Cloud Functions, Pub/Sub, BigQuery), and handle retries and error states. It's designed for cloud engineers building backend orchestration — not marketers or business analysts building automations.
Pros
- Deep native integration with all GCP services
- Serverless — no infrastructure to manage
- Generous free tier (5,000 internal steps/month)
- Enterprise-grade reliability and SLAs
- Pay-per-execution — no monthly commitment
Cons
- YAML/code only — no visual drag-and-drop builder
- Only useful if already on GCP
- No pre-built connectors for SaaS apps
- Steep learning curve for non-engineers
- Vendor lock-in to Google Cloud
Pricing: Free tier includes 5,000 internal steps/month. External HTTP calls: $0.01 per 1,000 steps after the free tier. Costs can escalate in high-volume pipelines with many external calls.
Verdict
Google Cloud Workflows is not a practical n8n alternative for general business automation. It's a backend orchestration service for GCP-native engineering workflows. If you need to automate Gmail, Google Sheets, or Google Calendar — n8n has native nodes for all of these, is visual and codeless, and runs for $2.99/month managed.
8. Automatisch — The Simplest Open Source n8n Alternative
Automatisch is an open source, self-hostable automation tool built explicitly as a free n8n and Zapier alternative. It's newer and simpler than n8n, with a clean interface that prioritises ease of use over raw power. If you want an open source automation tool that's easier to get started with than n8n, Automatisch is worth exploring.
Searches for "n8n alternatives open source" and "open source workflow automation alternative to n8n" often surface Automatisch alongside Activepieces as the two most direct competitors.
Pros
- Fully open source (AGPL-3.0)
- Free to self-host via Docker
- Cleaner, simpler UI than n8n
- European-based (strong GDPR stance)
- Growing integration library
Cons
- ~150 integrations (far fewer than n8n's 400+)
- Smaller community and ecosystem
- No AI agent or LLM nodes yet
- Less mature error handling and debugging
- Still requires server setup
Pricing: Free to self-host. A cloud-hosted version is planned. Like all self-hosted alternatives, server costs apply ($5–10/month typical).
Verdict
Automatisch is the most beginner-friendly open source n8n alternative for straightforward automation needs. For advanced workflows, AI agents, or a broader integration library, n8n is the clear winner — and at $2.99/month managed, it removes the only real argument for choosing a simpler self-hosted tool.
9. Gumloop — Best n8n Alternative for AI & LLM Automation
Gumloop is the fastest-growing n8n alternative for teams that want to put AI — ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, or any LLM — directly inside their automation workflows. Where n8n requires you to wire together individual AI nodes, Gumloop is built AI-native from the ground up: every workflow can include LLM calls, web scraping with intelligent extraction, data summarisation, and multi-step reasoning without writing a single line of code.
It ranks in the top 5 organically for "n8n alternatives" and is featured in Google's AI Overview — a strong signal that it's becoming the default choice for teams transitioning from traditional workflow automation to AI-powered automation. If your use case involves summarising content, researching leads, generating copy, or routing decisions through an AI model, Gumloop is a compelling option to evaluate alongside n8n.
Pros
- AI-native — any LLM integrated at every workflow step
- Visual drag-and-drop builder (no code required)
- MCP (Model Context Protocol) support for 500+ integrations
- Built-in web scraping with AI-powered extraction
- Pre-built templates for AI research and content pipelines
- Clean modern UI designed for non-developers
Cons
- Not open source — no self-hosting option
- Paid plans expensive vs traditional automation tools ($97+/mo)
- Newer platform — less enterprise track record than n8n or Zapier
- AI credit usage billed additionally on higher volumes
- Fewer native integrations than n8n's 400+ node library
Pricing: Free plan available. Paid plans start at approximately $97/month for teams. Enterprise pricing on request. AI model consumption may add costs at high usage volumes. Always confirm current pricing at gumloop.com.
Verdict
If your workflows are AI-first — LLM calls, web scraping with AI extraction, or autonomous agent pipelines — Gumloop is the best no-code n8n alternative for that specific use case. For teams that need open source, self-hosting, or a blend of AI and traditional automation, n8n on OpenHosst at $2.99/month wins on every dimension: it supports AI agent nodes, LangChain, and MCP integrations natively while giving you full data sovereignty and unlimited executions.
10. Pabbly Connect — Best Budget n8n Alternative (No Per-Step Charges)
Pabbly Connect is a no-code automation platform that occupies a distinct pricing niche: it does not charge for internal steps. On Zapier, Make.com, and most competitors, each action in a multi-step workflow counts against your monthly task or operation limit. On Pabbly Connect, only the trigger counts — making it significantly cheaper for complex workflows with many sequential actions.
With 1,000+ app integrations, a Zapier-style visual builder, and paid plans from around $14/month, Pabbly Connect is a popular n8n alternative for small businesses and agencies where Zapier or Make.com costs are the primary concern. It's cloud-only and closed source, but the pricing structure alone makes it worth comparing if you run high-volume multi-step flows.
Pros
- No per-internal-step charges — only triggers count toward limits
- Affordable pricing from approximately $14/month
- 1,000+ app integrations including Gmail, Shopify, WordPress
- Zapier-like visual builder — minimal learning curve
- Multi-step workflows with conditional logic and routers
Cons
- Closed source — no data sovereignty
- Cloud-only — no self-hosting option
- Smaller ecosystem and community than Zapier or Make
- Limited AI and agent capabilities
- Support and documentation less mature than larger platforms
Pricing: Free tier with limited tasks. Paid plans start at approximately $14/month (billed annually). Pricing changes frequently — always verify at pabbly.com/connect/pricing before committing.
Verdict
Pabbly Connect is worth evaluating if your main driver is reducing per-task costs on cloud-hosted automation. Its no-per-internal-step model genuinely saves money on complex flows versus Zapier or Make. That said, managed n8n from OpenHosst at $2.99/month has zero task limits at all — no execution caps, no operations ceiling, no per-step counting. For unlimited automation at the lowest price, n8n wins outright.
11. Microsoft Power Automate — Best for Microsoft 365 Teams
Microsoft Power Automate (formerly Microsoft Flow) is Microsoft's workflow automation platform, deeply embedded in the Microsoft 365 ecosystem. If your organisation runs on Outlook, Teams, SharePoint, Excel, and Dynamics 365, Power Automate is often the path of least resistance — it's included in many Microsoft 365 Business subscriptions and integrates natively with every Microsoft service.
For Microsoft-native organisations, "n8n vs Power Automate" is a genuine comparison — both support complex branching logic, webhooks, and custom API calls. The key difference: Power Automate is cloud-only, per-user priced, and designed around Microsoft environments; n8n works across any stack, is open source, and runs for $2.99/month managed regardless of team size.
Pros
- Deep native Microsoft 365 integration (Teams, SharePoint, Outlook, Excel)
- RPA capabilities — automate desktop UI workflows without code
- AI Builder for form recognition, prediction models, and text extraction
- Included with many Microsoft 365 Business subscriptions
- Enterprise-grade compliance, governance, and data residency
- Large template library for Microsoft-centric automation
Cons
- Per-user pricing — $15–40+/user/month for premium features
- Cloud-only — no self-hosting option
- Complex Microsoft licensing (Power Platform licensing is notoriously confusing)
- Weaker integration with non-Microsoft SaaS apps
- Slower and more limited for custom API workflows vs n8n
Pricing: Basic cloud flows are included in many Microsoft 365 Business subscriptions. Power Automate Premium: $15/user/month. Power Automate with RPA (Process plan): $40/user/month. AI Builder and premium connectors require additional licensing. Enterprise pricing via Microsoft sales.
Verdict
Microsoft Power Automate is the logical choice if your team is fully Microsoft 365 and primarily automating Microsoft-to-Microsoft workflows (Teams → SharePoint → Outlook, etc.). For cross-platform automation, non-Microsoft SaaS integrations, open-source flexibility, or cost sensitivity, n8n wins on every dimension. OpenHosst's managed n8n gives you 400+ integrations, unlimited executions, and AI agent nodes at $2.99/month — with no per-user pricing regardless of team size.
Why n8n + OpenHosst Beats Every Alternative
After comparing all eleven alternatives — from Zapier and Gumloop to Microsoft Power Automate — the pattern is clear: n8n gives you more — and managed n8n from OpenHosst gives it to you cheaper and easier than any alternative.
Here's what n8n offers that no alternative matches:
- 400+ native integrations — more than Activepieces (200), Automatisch (150), Node-RED (SaaS-limited), or Google Cloud Workflows (GCP only)
- Unlimited executions — no task limits, no operation caps, no monthly ceilings. Zapier stops at 750 tasks. Make.com stops at 10,000 operations. n8n runs as many workflows as your server allows.
- Visual + code — drag-and-drop nodes for non-developers, plus JavaScript and Python code nodes for engineers. No other tool combines both as well.
- AI agent nodes — n8n has native LangChain-compatible AI agent nodes for building autonomous AI workflows. None of the open source alternatives match this in 2026.
- Open source + data sovereignty — your workflows run on your infrastructure. Your data never leaves your server.
- Managed at $2.99/month — OpenHosst handles Docker, SSL, domain, updates, and uptime. You get all the benefits of self-hosting with none of the maintenance burden.
| What You Want | Best Choice | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Cheapest managed option | n8n @ OpenHosst | $2.99/mo vs $9–19.99/mo elsewhere |
| No self-hosting hassle | n8n @ OpenHosst | Fully managed, no DevOps needed |
| Open source + free self-host | Activepieces or n8n CE | Both MIT/Apache licensed, Docker-ready |
| Easiest no-code UX | Zapier or Make.com | Best polish, most hand-holding |
| Developer/code-first | Pipedream or n8n | Both support real code in workflows |
| IoT & hardware | Node-RED | Built for it, huge device library |
| GCP-native backend | Google Cloud Workflows | Serverless, native GCP integration |
| AI & LLM automation | n8n @ OpenHosst | Native LangChain + MCP, $2.99/mo vs Gumloop's $97/mo |
| Microsoft 365 teams | Power Automate or n8n | Power Automate for M365-only; n8n for cross-platform |
| Budget multi-step flows | n8n @ OpenHosst | Unlimited executions, no per-step caps — $2.99/mo |
Ready to try managed n8n?
7-day free trial. No credit card required. Setup takes under 5 minutes. Cancel any time.
Start Your Free Trial →Still on the fence? Read our guide on how to use n8n for free — including running it locally before committing to a hosted plan.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best free alternative to n8n?
The best free n8n alternative depends on what "free" means to you. If you want free to self-host, Activepieces and Automatisch are the closest open-source alternatives — both run on Docker at no software cost. Node-RED is also free and open source. If "free" means avoiding server management too, n8n Community Edition runs locally for free, and OpenHosst's managed hosting starts with a 7-day free trial.
Is there an open source alternative to n8n?
Yes — several. Activepieces (MIT license), Automatisch (AGPL), Node-RED (Apache 2.0), and Pipedream (open source core) are all open source workflow automation platforms you can self-host. n8n itself is also open source — the Community Edition is free to run on your own server, and n8n's open source model is one of its key advantages over Zapier and Make.com.
What is Google's alternative to n8n?
Google Cloud Workflows is Google's answer to workflow orchestration — but it's not a practical n8n alternative for most users. It's a YAML-based, serverless service designed for GCP engineers who need to chain together cloud services like Cloud Functions, Pub/Sub, and BigQuery. It has no visual drag-and-drop builder and no pre-built connectors for everyday SaaS tools. For general business automation involving Google services (Gmail, Sheets, Calendar), n8n has native nodes for all of them.
What is the cheapest n8n alternative?
IFTTT Pro starts at $2.99/month — the same as managed n8n from OpenHosst. But IFTTT is limited to simple IF/THEN logic with no multi-step workflows, no data transformation, and no API flexibility. For the same price, managed n8n gives you 400+ integrations, unlimited executions, branching logic, AI agent nodes, and full data sovereignty. For true workflow automation, n8n at $2.99/month is both the cheapest and most powerful option.
Can I self-host an n8n alternative for free?
Yes. n8n Community Edition, Activepieces, Automatisch, and Node-RED are all free to self-host. You only need a VPS ($5–10/month on providers like DigitalOcean or Hetzner). The tradeoff is setup and maintenance time — you'll need to configure Docker, SSL certificates, a domain, and handle updates yourself. For teams that prefer a hands-off approach, see what's involved in self-hosting n8n, then compare that to OpenHosst's managed setup at $2.99/month.
What are the best n8n alternatives for workflow automation platforms?
For general-purpose workflow automation platforms, the top n8n alternatives are: Zapier (easiest, most integrations but expensive), Make.com (best cloud-only value), and Activepieces (best open source free alternative). For AI-powered automation workflows, n8n's native LangChain nodes and AI agent support in 2026 put it ahead of every alternative on this list. No other workflow automation platform — free or paid — combines n8n's integration depth, open source flexibility, and AI capabilities at this price point.
What is the best n8n alternative for AI agent workflows?
For AI-native automation — LLM calls, autonomous agents, and RAG workflows — Gumloop is the most dedicated no-code n8n alternative: it integrates ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini directly into visual drag-and-drop workflows without code. However, n8n itself has comprehensive AI agent support in 2026: native LangChain nodes, MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration, and autonomous AI agent workflows are all built in. For teams that want AI capability without losing open-source flexibility and data sovereignty, managed n8n from OpenHosst at $2.99/month is the most cost-effective comprehensive solution — Gumloop's paid plans start at $97/month by comparison.
Is Microsoft Power Automate a good alternative to n8n?
Microsoft Power Automate is an excellent n8n alternative specifically for Microsoft 365-native teams automating across Teams, SharePoint, Outlook, and Dynamics 365. It includes RPA (robotic process automation for desktop workflows) and AI Builder for form recognition and predictions. The trade-offs: cloud-only, priced at $15–40/user/month, and significantly weaker for cross-platform or non-Microsoft integrations. For organisations automating across multiple SaaS platforms, or for teams without existing Microsoft 365 subscriptions, n8n on OpenHosst ($2.99/month, no per-user pricing, 400+ integrations) is substantially more cost-effective and flexible.
Is Gumloop better than n8n?
Gumloop is better than n8n if your primary use case is AI-powered automation — connecting LLMs to web scraping, content generation, or AI research pipelines without writing code. n8n is better for open-source flexibility, self-hosting, data sovereignty, complex multi-step business workflows, broader integration coverage (400+ nodes vs Gumloop's connector set), and cost at scale. n8n on OpenHosst starts at $2.99/month with unlimited executions; Gumloop's paid plans start at $97/month. Both support AI workflows — n8n via LangChain and MCP nodes, Gumloop as its core product design philosophy.